Sunday 19 Mt 13,24-43 is read. It is about the Kingdom of God.
Kingdom of God is restricted to the Christian world of faith.
For most Christians the Kingdom of God is restricted to the Christian world of faith. There is no logic in this. Jesus was a Jew and had contact with the Smaritans regarded as dogs by the Jews. He for sure had contact with the Essenes to.he wanted to convert to lost Hebrews. He did not want to spread phobia but love. I see a different Kingdom of God were all humans are welcome, with faith or not.
I decided to make a second post about this reading with focus on the mustard grain seed.
No priest talked about this parable probably because they are looked into the Genesis story of Moses and don’t want to see what Science says about the Universe’s first moments of existence.
Nils Bohr said once
“if you are not astonished by the words of Jesus, then you have not understood Jesus.”.
the grain of mustard grain parable
13:31 He set another parable before them, saying, “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field;
13:32 which indeed is smaller than all seeds. But when it is grown, it is greater than the herbs, and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in its branches.”
13:31 “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field;
13:32 which indeed is smaller than all seeds. But when it is grown, it is greater than the herbs, and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in its branches.”
“13:18 He said, “What is the Kingdom of God like? To what shall I compare it? It is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and put in his own garden. It grew, and became a large tree, and the birds of the sky lodged in its branches.”
3 . The disciples say to Jesus: “Tell us what the Kingdom of heaven is like!” He says to them: “It is like a grain of mustard: it is smaller than all the <other> seeds, but when it falls on ploughed land it produces a big stalk and becomes a shelter for the birds of heaven.”
what msutard seed was it really?
“At times, Bible scholars concluded erroneously that is was seed of the black mustard (Brassica nigra) Jesus talked about. The Brassica nigra seed grow up to a brush to seek shelter in as Thomas wrote but not a tree were birds lodge like Matthew and Luke said.
But this seed
a mustard tree that become so big that it can lodge birds in its branches is the three of Salvadora perisica. In scientific communities, the mustard tree is the Salvadora perisica, commonly called the toothbrush tree. they are in favor for the Salvadora because it is a larger plant than the black mustard and better able to accommodate birds resting in its branches. TheSalvadora perisica mustard tree grows throughout arid Africa and the Middle East.” ( godasagardener.com )
Thomas was more accurate. Jesus may have talked about the brassica nigra seed but described the parable as Thomas reported it. Indeed can birds find shelter in a big brassica nigra plant.
Metaphore for faith?
The metaphor of the seed is mainly interpreted as the faith in God that can grow. As I wrote in my introduction:
For most Christians, the Kingdom of God is restricted to the Christian world of faith. The Christians want to be the chosen people. But there is no logic in this.
Jesus was a Jew and had contact with the Samaritans that were regarded as dogs by the Jews. he had no Samarophobia like the Jews.
He for sure had contact with the Essenes too like John the Baptist. He wanted to convert to lost Hebrews. He did not want to spread phobia but love. I see a different Kingdom of God were all humans are welcome, whatever faith they belong to. As fart as they behave as good caring humans.
the kingdom of God
But is the Kingdom of God only restricted to the world of faith? I doubt that. I think that everything that exists (visible and not) is part of the Kingdom of God.
The disciples did not have knowledge enough to understand the parable of the grain of mustard in other contexts than their own faith and life experience.
Nor does probably many priests understand it, listening to their obscure bla bla bla explanations.
I see that the mustard grain and tree metaphor rather as a beautiful metaphor for the birth of the Universe. Something very small becomes something huge. I do it after having followed Pauls advice in Romans 1:19-20
Study the creation to be remove your blindness.
paul wrote a about woman, natural sex and other issue out of studio stereotypes of his time and biases. But I admire a free thinking part in Romans where he motivates us to study the creation:
. Paul’s motivation to do this in Romans 1:19,20 is very important to consider:
“What may be known of God is manifest in them for God has shown it to them.
For since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse”(Romans 1:19,20).”.
I find that Pauls words were followed by a few famous people Scietnist with open minds like Einstein who said:
“I believe in Spinoza’s God, Who reveals Himself
in the orderly harmony of what exists,
At Jesus time what smaller could be seen than mustard grains?
The Kingdom of God could be a metaphor for the Universe and its origin. A metaphor that is today illustrated with this image:
St. Augustine wrote: ‘If it happens that the authority of Sacred Scripture is set in opposition to clear and certain reasoning, this must mean that the person who interprets Scripture does not understand it correctly.” [St. Augustine, Epist. 143, 7, PL 33, 588]
I have found an alternative explanation for the grain of mustard and yeast that is in agreement with” clear and certain reasoning”.
But I have still not looked at the other parables about the Kingdom. These may contradict the conclusion I came to today.
Whatever, I find the parable of the yeast and mustard grain, to be just genius. Miracle stories are not needed to justify that this man is to be listened to.
I my learning about math history, I discovered a very special woman. I describe her with the help of texts taken from en.wikipedia.org. I reedited the text removing links that are required in Wiki, to make the text easier to read.
As you can see bleow there is a French book about her. I have not read it yet.
Because of her background and tragic end, I added this article in the main menu under Learning -Phislosophy as she was well known among philosopher. I added this article also under Theology – Christianity.as she is part of the early (and bad) history of Christianity, accused of being a whitch.
You will find all sources and references in wiki if you want to know more.
Hypatia, was born c. 350–370 and died 415). She was a Hellenistic Neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, mathematician and teacher, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt. Her father was her teacher and became later, her cooperator.
At her time, Egypt was part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker of the Neoplatonic school in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy.
She is the first female mathematician and philosopher whose life is reasonably well recorded.
Nothing is known about Hypatia’s mother, who is never mentioned in any of the extant sources.
Hypatia was renowned in her own lifetime as a great teacher and a wise counselor.
Although she herself was a pagan, she was tolerant towards Christians and taught many Christian students, including Synesius, the future bishop of Ptolemais. Ancient sources record that Hypatia was widely beloved by pagans and Christians alike and that she established great influence with the political elite in Alexandria.
Damascius states that Hypatia remained a lifelong virgin and that, when one of the men who came to her lectures tried to court her, she tried to sooth his lust by playing the lyre. When he refused to abandon his pursuit, she rejected him outright displaying her bloody menstrual rags and declaring
“This is what you really love, my young man,
but you do not love beauty for its own sake.”
Career and works
Hypatia was a Neoplatonist, but, like her father, she rejected the teachings of biographer Lamblichus and instead embraced the original Neoplatonism formulated by Plotinus. (In Plotinus philosophy, described in his Enneads, there are three principles: the One, the Intellect, and the Soul.) The Alexandrian school was renowned at the time for its philosophy, and Alexandria was regarded as second only to Athens as the philosophical capital of the Greco-Roman world. Hypatia taught students from all over the Mediterranean. According to Damascius, she lectured on the writings of Plato and Aristotle. He also states that she walked through Alexandria in a tribon, a kind of cloak associated with philosophers, giving impromptu public lectures.
“There was a woman at Alexandria named Hypatia, daughter of the philosopher Theon, who made such attainments in literature and science, as to far surpass all the philosophers of her own time. Having succeeded to the school of Plato and Plotinus, she explained the principles of philosophy to her auditors, many of whom came from a distance to receive her instructions. On account of the self-possession and ease of manner which she had acquired in consequence of the cultivation of her mind, she not infrequently appeared in public in the presence of the magistrates. Neither did she feel abashed in going to an assembly of men. For all men on account of her extraordinary dignity and virtue admired her the more.”
She is known to have written a commentary on Diophantus‘s thirteen-volume Arithmetica, which may survive in part, having been interpolated into Diophantus’s original text, and another commentary on Apollonius of Perga’s treatise on conic sections, which has not survived. Many modern scholars also believe that Hypatia may have edited the surviving text of Ptolemy’s Almagest, based on the title of her father Theon’s commentary on Book III of the Almagest.
Hypatia is known to have constructed astrolabes and hydrometers, but did not invent either of these, which were both in use long before she was born.
Hypatia has been described as a universal genius, but she was probably more of a teacher and commentator than an innovator. No evidence has been found that Hypatia ever published any independent works on philosophy and she does not appear to have made any groundbreaking mathematical discoveries.
During Hypatia’s time period, scholars preserved classical mathematical works and commented on them to develop their arguments, rather than publishing original works. It has also been suggested that the closure of the Mouseion and the destruction of the Serapeum may have led Hypatia and her father to focus their efforts on preserving seminal mathematical books and making them accessible to their students.
The Suda mistakenly states that all of Hypatia’s writings have been lost,but modern scholarship has identified several works by her as extant.
This kind of authorial uncertainty is typical of female philosophers from antiquity.
Hypatia wrote in Greek, which was the language spoken by most educated people in the Eastern Mediterranean at the time. In classical antiquity, astronomy was seen as being essentially mathematical in character Furthermore, no distinction was made between mathematics and numerology or astronomy and astrology.
Towards the end, murder and aftermath
Towards the end of her life, Hypatia advised Orestes, the Roman prefect of Alexandria, who was in the midst of a political feud with Cyril, the bishop of Alexandria. Rumors spread accusing her of preventing Orestes from reconciling with Cyril. Despite Hypatia’s popularity, Cyril and his allies attempted to discredit her and undermine her reputation.
Socrates Scholasticus mentions rumors accusing Hypatia of preventing Orestes from reconciling with Cyril. Traces of other rumors that spread among the Christian populace of Alexandria may be found in the writings of the seventh-century Egyptian Coptic bishop John of Nikiû, who alleges in his Chronicle that Hypatia had engaged in satanic practices and had intentionally hampered the church’s influence over Orestes. He wrote:
“And in those days there appeared in Alexandria a female philosopher, a pagan named Hypatia, and she was devoted at all times to magic, astrolabes and instruments of music, and she beguiled many people through her Satanic wiles. And the governor of the city honoured her exceedingly; for she had beguiled him through her magic. And he ceased attending church as had been his custom… And he not only did this, but he drew many believers to her, and he himself received the unbelievers at his house.”
According to Socrates Scholasticus, during the Christian season of Lent in March 415, a mob of Christians under the leadership of a lector named Peter, raided Hypatia’s carriage as she was travelling home.
They dragged her into a building known as the Kaisarion, a former pagan temple and center of the Roman imperial cult in Alexandria that had been converted into a Christian church.
There, the mob stripped Hypatia naked and murdered her using ostraka (which can either be translated as “roof tiles” or “oyster shells).Damascius adds that they also cut out her eyeballs.
They tore her body into pieces and dragged her mangled limbs through the town to a place called Cinarion, where they set them on fire.
According to Watts, this was in line with the traditional manner in which Alexandrians carried the bodies of the “vilest criminals” outside the city limits to cremate them as a way of symbolically purifying the city.
Although Socrates Scholasticus never explicitly identifies Hypatia’s murderers, they are commonly assumed to have been members of the parabalani. Christopher Haas disputes this identification, arguing that the murderers were more likely “a crowd of Alexandrian laymen”.
Socrates Scholasticus presents Hypatia’s murder as entirely politically motivated and makes no mention of any role that Hypatia’s paganism might have played in her death. Instead, he reasons that “she fell a victim to the political jealousy which at that time prevailed. For as she had frequent interviews with Orestes, it was calumniously report ed among the Christian populace that it was she who prevented Orestes from being reconciled to the bishop.”
Socrates Scholasticus unequivocally condemns the actions of the mob, declaring, “Surely nothing can be farther from the spirit of Christianity than the allowance of massacres, fights, and transactions of that sort.”
Hypatia’s murder shocked the empire and transformed her into a “martyr for philosophy”, leading future Neoplatonists such as Damascius to become increasingly fervent in their opposition to Christianity.
During the Middle Ages, Hypatia was co-opted as a symbol of Christian virtue and scholars believe she was part of the basis for the legend of Saint Catherine of Alexandria.
During the Age of Enlightenment, she became a symbol of opposition to Catholicism.
In the nineteenth century, European literature, especially Charles Kingsley’s 1853 novel Hypatia, romanticized her as “the last of the Hellenes”.
In the twentieth century, Hypatia became seen as an icon for women’s rights and a precursor to the feminist movement. Since the late twentieth century, some portrayals have associated Hypatia’s death with the destruction of the Library of Alexandria, despite the historical fact that the library no longer existed during Hypatia’s lifetime.
read more in en.wikipedia.org where you find all the sources used to know more about Hypathia.
Some modern scholars consider that the legend of Saint Ctherine_of_Alexandria martyred 18 year old 305 under Emperor Maxentius, was probably based on the life and murder of the Hypatia.
There is a film in Italian shared in Italian television 6-7 years ago. There is a Youtube with the film
Yo may also enjoy this youtube that also describes neoplatonism.
A extraordinary woman. Maybe she is the first woman to have been sacrificed by Christians because of political reasons. Many women have died after her but noone I have found had this remarkable history. Read more about these women in myarticle about witchhunt-in-europe. Hypatia’s history reminds me of that of Jeanne d’Arc who also died for political reasons.
As for March 6, more than hundred thousand humans got infected by Corona. 148 died in Italy; France has 500 infected, second after Italy in Europe.
China and Italy was badly hit first by this intelligent virus that has evolved to host unaware humans, keeping them in good health so they can “share” the virus with others.
We know that RNA and DNA containing organisms are made to mutate and evolve. Beside of a biological evolution with acquired immunities, humanity is now in the middle of a cultural evolution learning about viral pathogens.
There is a concurrential conflict still going on between RNA carriers (bacteria and viruses) and DNA carriers (animals and humans)
Like police all over the world must continuously develop new technique to protect against hacker created codes, so must DNA Humanity fight against the evolution of RNA carriers.
With the contagiousness of Corona virus, the world is now learning by concrete experience, how to protect itself from “intelligent” viruses like this.
Humanity is lucky to have a virus that has a 1-3 % fatality rate.
We are in the middle of a Experiential learning process.
Lentiviruses that causes HIV had a combination of long incubation and high mortality but it spread mainly blood by blood which made it much easier to fight.
We must learn to protect ourselves from viruses that mutate to develope both spreading capacity and high mortality. In other words a virus that combines infectivity (like Corona) and mortality (like filoviruses that cause Ebola with viral hemorrhagic fever or lentiviruses that causes human immunodeficiency (HIV)
I am not a virologist but I made my master in a clinical bacteriology lab (Inst för klinisk bakteriologi) in Göteborg making experiments 6 months with Salmonella typhimurium in a Morbus Chron research. So I studied basic virology. With this post I updated myself with new knowledges about virus and epidemiology.
I will here take a look at the most known viruses that are the results of a RNA evolution:
Influenza viruses. “Flu viruses”
Lentivirus “human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV)”
Herpes simplex 2.
Rhinovirus “cold virus”
Bacteriophage virus does not infect eucaryote carrying animals like humans. But I include information about this virus as the lifecycle of Bacteriophage is a good example of how viruses replicates and infect. This is how a bacteriophage can look like:
Britannica writes that “Bacteriophage, also called phage or bacterial virus, any of a group of viruses that infect bacteria…. Thousands of varieties of phages exist, each of which may infect only one type or a few types of bacteria or archaea. Phages are classified in a number of virus families; some examples include Inoviridae, Microviridae, Rudiviridae, and Tectiviridae. Like all viruses, phages are simple organisms that consist of a core of genetic material (nucleic acid) surrounded by a protein capsid. The nucleic acid may be either DNA or RNA and may be double-stranded or single-stranded. “ read more in Britannica
arbovirus is an acronym (arthropod-borne virus)
“Any of a group of viruses that are transmitted by mosquitoes, ticks, or other arthropods. “lexico.com
So far, three genera of this virus family have been identified: Cuevavirus, Marburgvirus and Ebolavirus. Structurally, filovirus virions (complete viral particles) may appear in several shapes, a biological features called pleomorphism.” www.cdc.gov
In the family of retroviruses there is the lentiviruses that causes HIV.
“Lentiviruses persist lifelong. This is a function both of their ability to integrate into the host chromosome and of their ability to evade host immunity. This ability to evade host immunity may be related both to the high mutation rates of these viruses, and to their ability to infect immune cells (macrophages, and in the case of HIV, T-cells).” ( ehs.stanford.edu/reference )
“Lentiviruses belong to the family retroviridae, subfamily Orthoretroviridae, genus Lentivirus, characterized for long incubation periods (lente-, Latin for “slow”). The virions (or virus particles) are enveloped, spherical and within a size range of 80-100 nm in diameter. Inside the envelope (a lipid membrane derived from portions of the host cell membranes (phospholipids and proteins), but include some viral glycoproteins) resides the nucleocapsids or core where the single strand of viral RNA is packaged. One of the most striking features of this virus, from the retroviridae family, is its ability to infect both dividing and non-dividing cells and its ability to integrate a significant amount of viral RNA into the DNA of the host cell, which qualifies them as one of the most efficient methods for gene delivery.” ( ki.se )
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a viral infection that’s passed between people through skin-to-skin contact. There are over 100 varieties of HPV, more than 40Trusted Source of which are passed through sexual contact and can affect your genitals, mouth, or throat.
“Human enteroviruses are a genus in the family Picornaviridae (small positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses) that were originally classified or named as polioviruses, Coxsackie A viruses, Coxsackie B viruses, echoviruses, and enteroviruses.” Read more at www.medicinenet.com
“A plasmid is a small, circular, double-stranded DNA molecule that is distinct from a cell’s chromosomal DNA. Plasmids naturally exist in bacterial cells, and they also occur in some eukaryotes. Often, the genes carried in plasmids provide bacteria with genetic advantages, such as antibiotic resistance.” read more in www.nature.com
I added plasmids despite it is a DNA molecule as it is interesting in research and how our cells can be reprogrammed. The given “antibiotic resistance.” is also interesting. to foresee future threats.
Approximately 2 billion individuals in the world have evidence of past or present hepatitis B, and 1.2 million people in the U.S. are chronically infected with hepatitis B. Read more at www.medicinenet.com
“Human enteroviruses are a genus in the family Picornaviridae (small positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses) that were originally classified or named as polioviruses, Coxsackie A viruses, Coxsackie B viruses, echoviruses, and enteroviruses. Rhinoviruses are included as enteroviruses by many researchers but not all.” Read more at www.medicinenet.com
Since the first reports of novel pneumonia (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, there has been considerable discussion on the origin of the causative virus, SARS-CoV-2 (also referred to as HCoV-19). Infections with SARS-CoV-2 are now widespread, and as of 11 March 2020, 121,564 cases have been confirmed in more than 110 countries, with 4,373 deaths.
SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans; SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe disease, whereas HKU1, NL63, OC43 and 229E are associated with mild symptoms … Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.(Read more at/Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 )
“The new corona virus continues to spread despite significant measures taken by the authorities in China to stop the outbreak. However, this time the fast response coupled with increased knowledge about the nature of the virus means the world is better placed to handle the outbreak compared to 18 years ago when SARS caused widespread concern, says virus researcher Ali Mirazimi, adjunct professor at the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Karolinska Institutet.” ( news.ki.se )
“A separate analysis by the team suggests that the L-type was derived from the older S-type. The first strain is likely to have emerged around the time the virus jumped from animals to humans. The second emerged soon after that, says the team. Both are involved in the current global outbreak. The fact that the L-type is more prevalent suggests that it is “more aggressive” than the S-type, the team say. Read more: www.newscientist.com/article
“We can fight Corona as a flue but it is not a flue” (Fabrizio Sala , vicepresident at Region Lombardia at Euronews March 11)
French research has understood that there are two families of this Corona virus.
I think that this youtube is a good presentation of epidemiology.
“It’s unclear whether people who recover from COVID-19 will be immune to reinfection from the coronavirus and, if so, how long that immunity will last.” Read more at www.npr.org
Here is a chart with some virus incidences “of selected upper respiratory tract infection pathogens. PIV = parainfluenza virus; RSV = respiratory syncytial virus; MPV = metapneumovirus; Group A Strept = group A streptococcus. “ Read more in emedicine.medscape.com
“Here at Live Science, we’ve compiled a list of the most pervasive myths about the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, the disease it causes, and explained why these rumors are misleading, or just plain wrong.” Read more at www.livescience.com
Here are the main titles in the article. I mark with text in bold for myth that may be interesting also for other viruses than Corona. read about these in www.livescience.com
Myth: Face masks can protect you from the virus “Standard surgical masks cannot protect you from SARS-CoV-2, as they are not designed to block out viral particles and do not lay flush to the face”
Myth: You’re waaaay less likely to get this than the flu
Myth: The virus is just a mutated form of the common cold
Myth: The virus was probably made in a lab
Myth: Getting COVID-19 is a death sentence
Myth: Pets can spread the new coronavirus
Myth: Lockdowns or school closures won’t happen in the US
Myth: Kids can’t catch the coronavirus “when children become infected, they seem less likely to develop severe disease”
Myth: If you have coronavirus, “you’ll know” “early on, infected people may show no symptoms at all.” (ed. due to longer incubation time)
Myth: The coronavirus is less deadly than the flu
Myth: It’s not safe to receive a package from China “coronaviruses can stay on surfaces such as metal, glass or plastic for as long as nine days,”
Myth: You can get the coronavirus if you eat at Chinese restaurants in the US
prevention from common cold (Rhinovirus that belongs to the Picornaviridae) is good to practice for most viral infections.
“The common cold refers to a group of symptoms caused by viruses. Rhinoviruses cause the most cases of the common cold, and more than 200 different viruses have been identified that cause cold symptoms. Colds are most often transmitted from one person to another via the hands – for example, by shaking hands with a person who has a cold. Droplets containing the virus may be coughed or sneezed by an infected person into the air and inhaled by another. The virus may contaminate a surface such as a doorknob or countertop.” Read more at www.medicinenet.com
1. Wash your hands often. 2. Avoid touching your face. 3. Don’t smoke 4. Use disposable items if a family member is infected. 5. Keep household surfaces clean. 6. Wash toys 7. Use paper towels 8. Throw tissues away after use 9. Maintain a healthy lifestyle 10. Control stress
According to a Canadian study where hospital personel participated. 20% of those who used surgical masks got flue:
Il Tempo published this table about inhaling and exhaling data for different masks. No sources were given:
Mask effectivenes after wearing time
Searching with the words “Influence on BFE of wearing time of surgical masks”
You dont find masks to buy while many use masks the wrong way, when it is not necessary. Who has a good instruction on how to use masks. Read in www.who.int . Below are the recommendations given by www.who.int .
If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCoV infection.
Wear a mask if you are coughing or sneezing.
Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.
If you wear a mask, then you must know how to use it and dispose of it properly.
Saanitizer liquids to protect surfaces are sold out in several countries. I found a site with a receipt (60% alcool, 40 % water or aloe gel solution)
says “Insider talked to Miryam Wahrman, a biology professor at William Paterson University and the author of “The Hand Book: Surviving in a Germ-Filled World,” about exactly how.
All you really need is alcohol, either isopropyl (rubbing) or ethyl (used in beer, wine, and spirits). As long as the solution is at least 60% alcohol, you can rub the liquid into your hands and let them air dry, then you’ll have effectively sanitized them.
“The bottom line is that alcohol is the active ingredient” in hand sanitizer, she said.
To make the experience a little gentler on your skin, you can moisturize after the alcohol has dried. You can also add a few drops of aloe vera to the rubbing alcohol, but make sure the liquid is over 60% alcohol so that the aloe doesn’t dilute it too much.
“If you drop below 60%, the effectiveness drops very dramatically,” Wahrman said.
A simple recipe
I tried this recipe that makes my hand feel good after sanitizing (I made 3 dl sanitizer).
1/3 denaturated water with some hand moisture fro dry skin (glycerol or similar to be bought in farmacy) (e.g. 1 dl)
2/3 96% alcohol (e.g. 2 dl)Calculated with 96% alcool you get a 0.96×2/3=64% sanitizer. You can therefore add some more if you want without passing 80%
Noone can tell why Corona spread so easily in Italy and now is spreading very fast in France.
I have to hypothesis about this.
Unawareness and myths
Italians (like Frenchmen, have a deeply rooted tradition of accepting close physical relations. Cheek kissing each other among friends is tradition like in Russia. Hand shake is of course also tradition as everywhere in the world.
There is a widely spread myth that cold air is a pathogen that causes cold, bronchitis and pneumonia so people avoid having windows open in winter and often accept vicinity with others.
This myth is built in the word in several languages.
English: You get a cold if you are in a cold environment.
Italian: You get a raffreddore if you are in a freddo environment.
German: You get a erkältung if you are in a kalt environment.
Swedish : You get a förkylning if you are in a kyld environment.
Despite many had bronchitis in January on the island of Lipari many were happily talking with each other in the small waiting rooms wiitng for a talk withe the doctor of course with windows and door closed as it was cold outside (about 17 Celsius). the doctor warned them telling them to keep distances but noone moved out.
Italians are used to flu epidemias but I see there has been little knowledge about how influenzaviruses spread itself and how to protect yourself from it except by vaccination.
Believes in Saints
A friend joked about Corona that the Saint Bartolo may save us islanders from Corona. But that joke may reveal a untold tradition that praying enough to the right saint, you are safe. There are saints for all kind of problems. If you travel Saint Christopher may keep you alive. If you travel with boat then pray to Saint Bartolo. The Romans had many gods. The Italians have many saints giving them immunity from all kind of dangers.
I wonder if this make people less interested in other solutions or motivated to protect themselves.
With the corona epidemia in Italy, Italians are now learning a lot about how to prevent spreading of this virus. As even the Vatican that should be safe from all kind of disease, also has a corona case, Italians are learning that praying to saints does not help them. So they are now starting to be preventive, accepting that schools and other activities are closed and prohibited.
500 scientists sent a letter to the UN. Read the Italian article about it at www.qualenergia.it or the original letter in English at clintel.nl with the title “There is no climate emergency”
It would be nice is there is no climate emergency. I will in this article, analyze their letter and share my personal conclusions.
I am a biologist and make my conclusion out of my knowledges in sceintific method, biology and chemistry. My knowledges in climatology are acrtualy limited so I will update my conclusions when I will be able to read a climatologists answers.
Ruggiero Rollini is a Italian student in chemistry dedicated to inform about scientific research and knowledge. he says that the 500 scientists are not climatologists. The climatologists around the world agree according to him, that the climate is changing rapidly The reason of this is the carbon dioxide rising levels in the atmosphere.
Searching for the word climatologist in the letter I found only Gerrit J. van der Lingen, that is a Paleoclimatologist from New Zealand. The others are experts in other areas like Chemistry, Civil engineering, Law, Philosophy, Pysics and mathematics.
Ruggiero Rollini talks about this letter in this Youtube:
“Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming. Only very few peer-reviewed papers even go so far as to say that recent warming is chiefly anthropogenic (ed. originating in human activity).”
It is not strange that the 500 mention this as a some of them are geologists. No professional climatologist would deny this fact.
But the issue is not the warming but the velocity of its increase and the raise of the carbon dioxide atmospheric content as can be read in the Italian article in www.repubblica.it and in www.nature.com
The average Carbon dioxide content during 2018 was 207.4 ppm (part per million)
“Only very few peer-reviewed papers even go so far as to say that recent warming is chiefly anthropogenic”
“Only a very few…” ansd “go so far” are not scientific statements and can therefore be ignored.
“Warming is far slower than predicted The world has warmed at less than half the originally-predicted rate, and at less than half the rate to be expected on the basis of net anthropogenic forcing and radiative imbalance. It tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.”
First of all, warming velocity is not the same all over the world. It depends on the biotopes. As a article in www.nature.com writes “the velocity of temperature change is lowest in mountainous biomes such as tropical and subtropical coniferous forests (0.08 km yr-1), temperate coniferous forest, and montane grasslands. Velocities are highest in flooded grasslands”
If the average “Warming is far slower” then his is good news. But they conclude this paragraph with the statement that we are “far from understanding climate change”. Professional “scientists” conclusion could in effect be something else: “Some countries already emit less than half as much carbon dioxide as the global average.”. E.g. India has discovered that producing electricity with carbon and other fossile fuels is far more expensive than by using photovoltaic panels. So they are doing huge investement in solar energy.
“Climate policy relies on inadequate models Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. Moreover, they most likely exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO 2 . In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.”
The scientists do not explain why “Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools.”
Then the scientists say that “they most likely exagerate”. What is “they” referring to? The models or the creator of the models? The 500 do not clearly write “they exagerate” adding names. There are probably no climatologists exagerating its conclusions.
CO2 is plant food,the basis of all life on Earth CO 2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Yes, CO2 is needed in photosynthesis but not to “all life on Earth”. They ignore the secondary effects of CO2. Look at the carbon dioxide levels from the time of the dinosaurs. and look at what happens with CO2 in the rain, rivers, lakes and seas.
“CO2 is not a pollutant” is another not scientific generic statement. What happens if you breath high levels of CO2? Try to be several people in a small space like a elevator without windows for a longer period. CO2 is not a pollutant for leaves thaty live with it. But it is a pollutant for plant roots and animals who suffer for the increased water and blood acidity.
Scientists should not be aprtial, generalizing and ignoring facts.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more fre – quent. However, CO-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines kill birds and insects, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.
“has not increased natural disasters” is another statement without proof. How do you know that?
“There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods…”
If their statement would be scientific they should show evidence of the opposite, that :
“There is statistical evidence that global warming is not intensifying hurricanes, floods….”
“wind turbines kill birds and insects.” yes some birds are killed. But how many are killed by increased CO2 levels. A scientist should compare.
Who is talking about producing more palm-oil to decrease CO2 levels ? For sure not scientists. Another not scientific misleading and irrelevant stateent.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, we will have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities”
off course but not pseudo scientists like these 500 that do not follow scientific rules of conduct.
“there is no cause for panic and alarm” the 500 have not shared any proof we should not panic. But I can add one. Panicking is never good for psychological reasons. our frontal reasoning love does not work well in states of panic.
“to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times”
Are only fossile fues reliable and affordable energy. The 500 ignore the development of batteries and energy conservation methods.
And of course we may need fossile fules somewhere, now and then. like e.g. in mining but this need is very restricted.
But there are more reasons to start investing in solar energy and avoid fossil fuel consumtion: price and health are scientific and economic realities we should look at:
Solar panels are becoming cheaper and cheaper
Driving with solar energy you do not spend money in fuels.
by walking and cycling you gain physical and psychological health.
we save money and time by taking train or buss. How much time We we spend taking care of our car and motorbyke?
By taking e.g. the train, we get more time for relax and learning by being able to read and talking with copassengers.
By walking and taking the train or bus we are able socialize if we want to. Wed get to know new people and cultures.
The risc of accidents is not to be ignored for the different transport methods.
Fuel cosuming airplane traveling can be avoided in many cases.
These 500 scientists have with this letter, breached several of the rules of conduct by doing “Deceptive reporting of research results” presenting partia,l scientific prooven knowledge while ignoring other basic scientific results. They do not share any climatologic proof nor climatologic source.
No scientific journal of dignity, would publish this letter with its lack of sources and plentiness of generic, not scientifically based statements and subjective language (with words like “very few “, “far from”, “unlikely”, “far”, “remotely”, “inadequate” and generic personal pronoun like “they”).
That Gerrit J. van der Lingen, a Paleoclimatologist, signs such a unprofessional and unscientific document, is remarkable.
The 500 “scientists”, do not give any proof that carbon dioxide can be excluded as a cause of climate change.
they do not give any explanation why temperature on Earth fluctuates and in what extent. e.g telling about he distance of Earth to the Sun)
They do not explain why the rate of temperature change we see this century, is so fast.
They presume that the melting of glaciers and ices at the north pole only depend on natural phenomena and they do not explain why.
they never mention the speed of climate change as has been written about in e.g. a article July 25. See the Italian article in www.repubblica.it
Greta is a young girl that uses a young girls enthusiastic language. She correctly repeated the we should listen to the Scientists. She should instead now instead say
“Listen to the climatologists and avoid pseudoscientists!
As Ruggero mentions, 97% of the climatologist agrees about the conclusion regarding climate change. Ruggeros Rollini shares several sources in the comment of his youtube. one of these mentioning the number 97% and the no of articles about the issue, is
Today we read Luke 10:38-42. The text made me think about priorities.
Elisabeth of Trinity, I wrote about in a previous post decided to become a Carmelitan nun.
Märta in Sweden did the same 1998 . She was 19 when she made this decision. A Swedish documentary at www.svtplay.se/video/2135690/nunnan tells about her. She is today happy with her decision 20 years ago, still happily active in a Swedish Carmelitan monastery.
Other youth want to become bosses, drug dealers or soccer champions. Most of them want to become rich.
We all make priorities and decision in our lives.
The Luke Gospel text today is about what makes you happy and feel good. The meaning of life we have is important. I wrote about meaning of life in a previous post.
Next day, he took out two denarii and handed them to the innkeeper and said, “Look after him, and on my way back I willmake good any extra expense you have.” Which of these three, do you think, proved himself a neighbour to the man who fell into the bandits’ hands?’
He replied, ‘The one who showed pity towards him.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Go, and do the same yourself.’
In the course of their journey he came to a village, and a woman named Martha welcomed him into her house.
She had a sister called Mary, who sat down at the Lord’s feet and listened to him speaking.
Now Martha, who was distracted with all the serving, came to him and said, ‘Lord, do you not care that my sister is leaving me to do the serving all by myself? Please tell her to help me.’ But the Lord answered, ‘Martha, Martha,’ he said, ‘you worry and fret about so many things, and yet few are needed, indeed only one. It is Mary who has chosen the better part, and it is not to be taken from her.’
I read years ago about Silence and the importance of it in Andliga skrifter” page 122 from Elisabeth of Trinity a Carmelitan sister living in France at the end of Ninetheenth century. It is remarcable that this sister, who was a talented pianist as a young girl became the “Messenger of the Silence”.
Her vocation was simply prayer, silence, and suffering, “because our Lord lives in our soul, His prayer dwells within us and it is there I want to abide without ceasing, as a little vase at the source and fountain of life”
“Prayer, solitude, praise of glory, silence of the mind and heart are, as many biblical values, dear to Eastern Monasticism, and they culminate in “Esychia” (hence hesychism), that is interior quietude and serenity of the soul which has emigrated to God and found its peace in Him
To be with God, Elizabeth sought silence and solitude. “
“‘I so long for Him!’ wrote Elizabeth, ‘He creates a great void in my soul that only He can fill, and to do that He leads me into deep silence from which I should like never to emerge”
Sufi ask you to listen. But they really do not request silence to hear the voice as Rumi said. Maybe it is more about a inner silence, because music is part of Sufi spiritual meditation.
Silence in churches
I look for silence now and then in churches. But most Lutheran churches in Sweden are closed when there is no mass. When I were in Visby I found however the Dome open. This is a video of its interior. Raise the volume and listen if you hear something. Do not worry. No stupid sound jokes.
Science about Silence
The importance of Silence is now more and more recognized scientifically.
On my trip to göteborg last week I found a article in Swedish about Silence in the train www.sj.se Magazine by Erica Jakobson with the title
Silence – I try to live!
Erica informs in her article about recent research about silence.
Two hours silence each day hel develop nerve cells in Hypocampus, the part of the brain that deals with memories, feelings and learning. This is the conclusion of a American research goroup after experimens with adult mice exposed to noice and silence.
Another study organized by WHO and the EU-commission has found that lo levels of noice increases stress hormone levels, decreased learning hability and even hearth failure.
Victoria Palm grounder of OAS says :
“We know that people restore while sleeping but never thinks about relax during the day. In a world where we are constantly exposed to stimuli, is it impossible for the brain to restore energy.
I were surprised that there were department in the train wagons were people are informed that it is a silent department.
A italian article about silence translated
The World Health Organization has defined noise pollution a “modern plague” because “there is indisputable evidence that exposure to environmental noise has negative effects on the health of the population”.
The human being needs silence to live well. Silence has become a rarity tin our increasingly noisy cities. In the Western world we run away from the noise ,wearing a noise canceling headphones or participating at yoga meditation sessions.
In India, the population went to the streets to demand the right to silence, against honking cars and motorbikes.
Meanwhile, the technology is studying and putting devices on the market to soundproof environments taking advantage of the wireless vibration, but also bracelets that replicate the heartbeat to remove stress from the brain, caused by the surrounding noise.
A ingenious publicity tourism office in Finland to attract tourists to Finland with slogans about silence, depicting views of unspoiled nature. It is the same principle that inspired the Benedictine monks of Pluscarden Abbey, Scotland, to open the doors of the convent, which dates from the thirteenth century, to anyone who wants to spend a few nights (or months) in complete tranquility.
The silence, in short, has become a business.
This business grows with the noise of the cities. depicting views of silent nature. The silence, in short, has become a business.
ALESSANDRA FRIGERIO, PSYCHOLOGIST WITH a PhD in cognitive and clinical social psychology, is a professor at the University of Milano-Bicocca and the Sigmund Freud University. Repubblica asked her: “In the hyper-connected world and in the noisy society we live in, is there really an increased demand for silence?” ALESSANDRA: “There is a high quest to get to silence. These requests are answered, for example in meditation classes, yoga retreats, relaxing drive.” “However, there are ways to live the silence, that allow access to its own needs through structures and standardized methodologies, like e.g. silent fast food.”
What can silence be?
!People often perceive it is repressed by silence, because silence can represent a heavy experience. Be in silence means dealing with an apparent void, with a series of enigmatic aspects of unresolved questions. Our tendency is therefore to fill the silence with noise (ed. music e.g. in stores, bars or on the beach) or repetitive meaningless talking. Silence confront us with the limits of language. It is the space of the unspoken, what we fail to express with words.!”
Effects on mental well-being
“”In the past, many psychologists have shown that silence serves to foster creativity. The brain cells regenerate and, in the hippocampus area a development of new cells that can become neurons is made possible that help boost memory and learning.
silence is essential for the healthy development of a child
In this regard, silence is essential for the healthy development of a child. A parent who knows how to give the silence, as well as the words, shows the child the significance of absence, which is as important as the presence. In addition, leave the child in an empty space, in the silence, where even you can get bored, so need to be able to feed their own creativity. In other words, an agenda full of commitments is often counterproductive”
Silence in clinical practice
“Silence for a psychologist or a psychoanalyst is an integral part of the instrumentation. The therapist is mostly silent because it leaves the patient an area of freedom. Thus permitting a chain of speeches, to get rid of the words, beyond the constraints of consistency, morality, rational logic. The silent listening allows the patient to be a able auto-listener, grasping the implications of his own words. Sometimes the analyst’s silence is for those who do not an”swers at a patient’s questions. It does so because it avoids influencing the individual with his judgment and to avoid being pedagogical. Silence, in this case, is to return the patient’s own question, to find the best solution. “
Silent zones in India.
India has silent zones that are comparable to the C zones in the center of Milan that prohibit cars to circulate. The difference is that in India the traffic ban was not raised against smog and air pollution, but against noise. It all started a few years ago in the chaotic Mumbai, where a group of activists began to demonstrate for the right to peace. The reason is that the average decibel level in Mumbai is more than 80, while the World Health Organization indicates it should not exceed the maximum threshold of 65 decibels by day and 40 at night.
So the Mumbai High Court ruled the noise absolute prohibition in a radius of at least 100 meters around hospitals, schools, courts, parks, public buildings, libraries and universities.
Read more in La Republica Dossier 13/7 2019
Silence on the island of Lipari
The silence has partly abandoned Lipari. Donkeys have disappeared and cars and motorbikes have take over on the roads. Police does not care about the noice that some cause with their scooters and mototìrbykes. Happily July is the month of silence. You are not allowed to run building machines during that month probably to protect the tourists that come to the island on that month. But for those that are unlucky to live in the village near a bar you may not be able to sleep at all from the evening at 10, until morning at 4-5 the next day. The night, summer time is party time on Lipari with musicians playing all the evenings, a Eden for youth that prefer to sleep during the day.
But there are many opportunities to enjoy silence on the island anyway. In the early mornings or if you make trekking in the valleys you find a incredibly relaxing silence.
If you come to Lipari and you want silence, I recommend not to stay in the village of Lipari in July and August but instead find rooms outside like in the smaller villages like Pianoconte, Quattropani or Acquacalda. E.g. hotel Cutimare in Acquacalda on the north part of the Island is probably a good choice. there is only one road that has little or no traffic, one little bar and at a distance, one restaurant.
I definitively prefer to live on Lipari. Fortunenately my house is outside the village so I really enjoy the dark and silent nights and the early silent mornings. Sometimes there are dogs barking. But I can stand that.
“And now a lawyer stood up and, to test him, asked, ‘Master, what must I do to inherit eternal life?’ 26
He said to him, ‘What is written in the Law? What is your reading of it?’ 27 He replied,
‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your strength, and with all your mind, and your neighbour as yourself.’ 28 Jesus said to him, ‘You have answered right, do this and life is yours.’29 But the man was anxious to justify himself and said to Jesus, ‘And who is my neighbour?’ 30 In answer Jesus said, ‘A man was once on his way down from Jerusalem to Jericho and fell into the hands of bandits; they stripped him, beat him and then made off, leaving him half dead.”
Being attacked by bandits is something that happened frequently at the time of Jesus, when traveling to Jerusalem. For this reason it was safer to follow caravans or travel together in bigger groups. So Jesus used a example that was a well known reality for the lawyer.
Jesus and his family may themself have experienced bandits on their way to Jerusalem.
31 Now a priest happened to be traveling down the same road, but when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 In the same way a Levite who came to the place saw him, and passed by on the other side.
33 But a Samaritan traveller who came on him was moved with compassion when he saw him.
34 He went up to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring oil and wine on them. He then lifted him onto his own mount and took him to an inn and looked after him.
35 Next day, he took out two denarii and handed them to the innkeeper and said, ‘Look after him, and on my way back I will make good any extra expense you have.’
36 Which of these three, do you think, proved himself a neighbour to the man who fell into the bandits’ hands?’
37 He replied, ‘The one who showed pity towards him.’ Jesus said to him, ‘Go, and do the same yourself.’
Jesus was not a Levite
The Levites were one of the 12 tribes of Israel. Today there are still a few hundred Levites living on the West Bank
Despite being discriminated by the Jews, Jesus had according to me a good relation with Samaritans and the Samaritans looked at him as the “Saviour of the World” without the need of Jesus making miracles.
Marc, Matthew and Luke choosed for some reason to tell only about how the Samaritan rejected Jesus hospitality once on their way to Jerusalem.
In John 4,3-39 , we are given a completely different picture
the story starts with the encounter of Jesus with the woman at the well
39 Many Samaritans of that town (ed. Sychar) believed in him on the strength of the woman’s words (ed the Samaritan woman Jesus met and talked with at the well outside Sychar) of testimony,
40 So, when the Samaritans came up to him, they begged him to stay with them. He stayed for two days, and 41 many more came to believe on the strength of the words he spoke to them; 42 and they said to the woman, ‘Now we believe no longer because of what you told us; we have heard him ourselves and we know that he is indeed the Saviour of the world.’
If you know about this encounter, you may read Matthew 10:5-6 differently:
5 ‘Do not make your way to gentile territory, and do not enter any Samaritan town; 6 go instead to the lost sheep of the House of Israel.”
The Jews’ view about the Samaritans.
the Jews hated the Samaritans as “dogs,” or “half-breeds.” according to housetohouse.com probably because the Samaritans intermarried with the Assyrian invaders (ed. in fact they loved their enemies as Jesus teached) and they stopped traveling to Jerusalem to offer sacrifice and worship helping to rebuild Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity.
the Samaritan story is to be seen in the ligth of Jesus statemen in( Matthew 20,16 ) ‘ “the first shall be last, the last shall be first”
jesus did not agree with the Samaritans about Mount Gerizim that was and still is sacred for the Samaritans. John 4,20-26 tells what the Samaritan woman at the well said and how Jesus answered:
20 ‘Our fathers worshipped on this mountain (ed. she must refer to the nearby Mount Geerizim), though you say that Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship.’ 21 Jesus said: Believe me, woman, the hour is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know; for salvation comes from the Jews. 23 But the hour is coming — indeed is already here — when true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth: that is the kind of worshipper the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and those who worship must worship in spirit and truth. 25 The woman said to him, ‘I know that Messiah — that is, Christ — is coming; and when he comes he will explain everything.’ 26 Jesus said, ‘That is who I am, I who speak to you.’
28 The woman put down her water jar and hurried back to the town to tell the people, 29 ‘Come and see a man who has told me everything I have done; could this be the Christ?’ 30 This brought people out of the town and they made their way towards him.”
Jesus must showed how to be respectful to the Samaritans. So…
“The apostles recognized that in the Church Samaritans must be accepted as equal to Jews. Peter and John conducted a special mission to Samaria to confirm Samaritans who had already been baptized by Philip (Acts 8:14-17). This initiation of the Samaritans was a middle stage between the preaching of the gospel to the Jews (Acts 2) and the preaching of the gospel to full-blooded Gentiles (Acts 10).” ( Source: www.catholic.com )
As said above I tried to know about the Samaritan-Jew relation today in jewsforjesus.org disqus but got no clear answer. I like their interreligious (Christian-Judaism) approach but to get in peach with e.g. Christians you have to look for peace also with the Samaritans of today as the Samaritans were the last at Jesus time and Jesus said that the last (in Society like the Samaritans at Jesus time) will be first in Heaven. This post let me to write a post about Judaism and Christian theology. You find it in in www.kinberg.net/wordpress/stellan/2019/08/07/judaism-and-christian-theology/
I loved the article “Il faticoso aggiornamento dell’Homo Tecnologicus” in English “The arduous update of Homo Tecnologicus” written by Stefano Massini Repubblica June 22. This is my translation of part of it.
A few hours are required to update a computer’s software. Let’s not talk about smartphones: just a few minutes. It is a pity that it does not work for the human beings.
The update (understood as a new tuning in to reality, correcting errors and alleged dogmas) costs the children of Adam time and effort. fvar more than just a click.
The technological devices do not have psychologies, and as such do not resist updating in the motivation “my convictions may be wrong but they are part of me”.
So we are all backward, stuck in the past, encrusted in a block of certainties that we conceive as one with our identity.
…. There is no operating system that does not end up crashing without the periodic update: what causes the so-called crash is the fact that the machine no longer dialogues with the outside, the files are missing, it does not recognize the languages. In the end it is the same thing that happens to the Homo Sapiens Tecnologicus: closing the mind to external stimuli means neither more nor less isolating oneself. “