I like independent and thinking women and I dont want to be a ruler in the house. I like to cooperate so I am very reluctant to such instructions.
You do not hear these and similar texts at Catholic mass anymore.
It is a fact that women are better students, get often better results and are many times more intelligent than men.
So I see no intelligence in this sentence of Paul nor a inspiration of all knwowing God. How many women have not been beaten and even killed because they did not “submit” to their husbands acccording to a presumed “divine” law? Looking at what men have done on this earth, men should submit and listen to their wise women sometimes.
Women are taking over more and more, as doctors, pilotes, experts, polices, not only in the western world.
How many time haven’t you read about Psychotic Thoughts when e.g. a killer said “A voice told me to do this.”
Believe in the Devil or not, but such thoughts are a reality. If there is a devil, not only killers have been misled. As I wrote above even the Christian apostles Peter and Paul may have in my opinion, been misled. Peter killed Anania and Sapphira for a stupid lie, as I wrote about in “Top abuse of power”.
Eve were tempted according to the old Genesis and Adam didnt use his brain and followed Eve to please her.
Jesus was tempted in the desert. Maybe even other prophets were miled like Mohamad (PBUH) who attacked monotheist Zoroastrians having them to search safety in India.
All of us humans especcially if we have power, are subject to the risc of being misled. Look at the sideffects of power:
‘Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely’
. There are maybe up to a trillion of species on earth. Wy all those species on Earth?
A interesting issue is that the Quran gives space for a “Evolution of the Human species” hypothesis, something that the Bible by literalists seemingly doesn’t. (Source www.answeringislamicskeptics.com as can be read in Quran 76:1 that says: “Has there come on man a long period of time when he was a thing unremembered?”
According to the Quran the Paradise with Adam and Eve were created in Heaven were Adam were condemned to leave the Paradiss to go down to Earth incarnated in a mortal body. This led me further into my unified creation theory and my enlightened genesis , a Genesis of the 2nd millenium where I describe my agnostic belief and hypothesis of a God and the births of the worlds and human kind.
earth is autoregenerative
The earth is autoregenerative. The whole biosphere system has autoregeneration builtin. Look at nature after a fire. It take very little time to recreate life on burned land.
The diversity of species and the evolution is maybe part of a regenerative planet Earth. The other species are there in case a new evolution has to be activated. When the metheor fell over the Caraibic, the dynosaurs died out and other species probably mices, took over.
We burn fuels and produce huge amounts of carbon dioxide. If humanity doesn’t, the Earth biosystem handles this as it did in the Cambrian age when e.g. Sweden was a shallow sea.
of course in Nature, cell produce biomass with carbon dioxide. The more carbon dioxide the more biomass as were the case in the Cambrian age when all our fossile fuel deposits (gas, oil, carbon deposits) were produced from biomass of among otghers dinoflagellate algae and trees.
A total atomic world war will destroy the Earth biosphere? It will certainly create problems but more for humans than for other creatures.
Our biosphere is autoregenerative and the biodiversity of species and evolution mechanisms are important part of this. We are making our life a hell but Earth does not need humans. Humans need the Earth.
I am reading the Italian book “Born to believe” from Vittorio Girotto, Telmo Pievani, Giorgio Vallortigara that talks about the problem Darwin had with his theory about the origin of species.
He said among others in his “Origin of species”:
“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
Evolution of complex organs (like the eye), plants and bodies.
As Darwin wrote in his book “The Origin of species in the Sixth Edition – 1872:
“Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.” (Source: http://darwiniana.org/eyes.htm )
Research are finding more and more answers on the eye evolution hypothesis. This video show different evolutionary level s of development of vision and how our own eyes limit (the blind spot) is evidence of a incomplete evolution. It is maybe not liked by fancreationists (fanatic ceationists)